Common Coding Mistakes in Florida PIP Claims: Protecting Your Practice from Underpayments

Florida PIP Insurance Underpayments for Medical Providers

As a medical professional in Florida, you are committed to providing essential care to patients, especially those recovering from automobile accidents. Unfortunately, insurance companies like State Farm, GEICO, and other Personal Injury Protection (PIP) carriers often reduce reimbursements for the necessary services you offer.

Florida PIP insurance underpayments for medical providers are becoming a widespread issue. Insurers misuse coding practices and apply improper reductions, directly impacting the financial health of your practice.

Understanding these practices and knowing how to challenge them is critical. Protecting your revenue ensures that you are fairly compensated for the services you provide, keeping your practice sustainable in the long term.

Understanding PIP Insurance Underpayments

What Is PIP Insurance?

In Florida, Personal Injury Protection (PIP) insurance is mandatory for all drivers. It provides immediate coverage for medical expenses and lost wages, regardless of who is at fault in an accident. PIP is designed to ensure that individuals receive prompt medical treatment without the delays that can come with determining liability.

How Underpayments Occur

Insurance carriers often reduce medical bills by applying obscure Medicare reduction codes and methodologies without proper notification. These practices lead to reimbursements that fall short of what is owed to providers, as detailed in Florida Statutes 627.736, which governs PIP under Florida’s no-fault system.

Common Issues:

  • Lack of Transparency: Insurers fail to disclose the use of certain payment reduction methodologies in their policies.
  • Improper Coding: Application of coding practices like NCCI edits and MPPR without proper policy inclusion.
  • Unilateral Reductions: Arbitrary reduction of payments for services provided by physician assistants and nurse practitioners.

Impact on Your Practice

Underpayments can significantly affect your revenue, limiting your ability to invest in resources, staff, and technologies that enhance patient care. Over time, these financial losses can accumulate, putting your practice at risk.

Decoding Medicare Reductions and Coding

What Is Medicare Coding?

Medicare coding involves standardized codes and methodologies to determine reimbursement amounts for medical services. Since 2012, Florida’s PIP law allows insurers to use the Medicare Fee Schedules as a basis for payments, but insurers often misuse these codes, leading to improper payment reductions.

Common Coding Methodologies Misused by Insurers

  1. National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) Edits:
    • Designed to prevent improper coding leading to inappropriate payments.
    • Insurers misuse NCCI edits to deny or reduce payments without proper justification.
  2. Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction (MPPR):
    • Reduces payment for multiple procedures provided to the same patient on the same day.
    • Insurers apply MPPR without disclosing this methodology in their policies.
  3. Physician Assistant (PA) and Nurse Practitioner Reductions:
    • Medicare allows payment at 85% of the fee schedule for services provided by PAs and nurse practitioners.
    • Insurers reduce payments accordingly without proper policy inclusion.

The Problem with Improper Coding

  • Lack of Notice: Insurers are required to inform providers and insured parties about any coding methodologies used.
  • Policy Inclusion: Without clear policy language, the application of these reductions is improper.
  • Legal Violations: Using undisclosed coding methodologies violates Florida PIP statutes and case law.

Legal Requirements for Insurers in Florida

Policy Transparency

Florida law mandates that insurance policies must:

  • Clearly Elect Payment Methodologies: Insurers must explicitly state any intention to use Medicare coding methodologies.
  • Provide Unambiguous Language: Policies should be free from vague terms that can be misinterpreted.
  • Notify All Parties: Both the insured and the medical provider must be aware of any payment reductions or coding practices.

Key Legal Precedents

Pan Am Diagnostic Services, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

  • Case Summary:
    • The court ruled that State Farm could not apply the MPPR because their policy did not clearly elect this payment methodology.
    • Emphasized the necessity for insurers to disclose their reimbursement practices transparently.
  • Implications for Providers:
    • Strengthens the position of medical providers in disputes over improper reductions.
    • Sets a precedent that undisclosed payment reductions are unlawful.

Statutory Obligations

Under Florida Statutes:

  • §627.736(5)(a): Insurers may limit reimbursement to the Medicare fee schedule but must clearly elect this in the policy.
  • Notice Requirements: Insurers must inform policyholders and providers of any limitations or reductions in coverage.

Protecting Your Practice: Steps to Recover Owed Payments

Recognizing Improper Reductions

  • Review EOBs Carefully: Examine your Explanation of Benefits for unfamiliar codes or unexplained reductions.
  • Common Red Flags:
    • Codes like NCCI, MPPR, or unexplained percentage reductions.
    • Lack of detailed explanations for payment adjustments.

Steps to Take

  1. Document Everything:
    • Keep meticulous records of all communications, EOBs, and billing statements.
    • Note any discrepancies or lack of explanations for reductions.
  2. Consult a Florida PIP Attorney:
    • An attorney specializing in PIP law can assess your situation.
    • They can advise on the best course of action to recover owed payments.
  3. File a Formal Dispute:
    • Send a demand letter to the insurer outlining the improper reductions.
    • Include references to relevant statutes and case law supporting your position.
  4. Prepare for Litigation if Necessary:
    • If the insurer fails to respond appropriately, legal action may be required.
    • Your attorney can file a lawsuit to recover the full amount plus any applicable interest and attorney fees.

Benefits of Taking Action

  • Financial Recovery: Reclaim funds that are rightfully yours.
  • Policy Change: Encourage insurers to amend their practices and policies.
  • Industry Impact: Contribute to broader changes that benefit all medical providers in Florida.

The Role of Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners

Understanding the 85% Rule

  • Medicare Guidelines:
    • Services provided by PAs and nurse practitioners are reimbursed at 85% of the physician fee schedule.
  • Insurer Obligations:
    • Insurers must disclose this reduction in their policies for it to be permissible.

When Reductions Are Permissible

  • Explicit Policy Inclusion:
    • The insurer’s policy must specifically mention the 85% payment methodology.
    • General references to Medicare guidelines are insufficient.

When Reductions Are Not Permissible

  • Lack of Clear Policy Language:
    • If the policy does not explicitly state the reduction, applying it is improper.
  • Violation of Statutory Requirements:
    • Undisclosed reductions violate Florida’s PIP statutes and can be challenged legally.

Ensuring Fair Compensation

  • Advocate for Your Staff:
    • Ensure that PAs and nurse practitioners are properly credited and compensated for their work.
  • Legal Recourse:
    • Seek legal assistance to recover underpaid amounts resulting from improper reductions.

Taking Action Against Improper Insurance Practices

The Importance of Collective Action

  • Industry-Wide Impact:
    • When multiple providers challenge improper practices, it pressures insurers to change.
  • Prevent Future Underpayments:
    • Successful disputes set precedents that discourage insurers from continuing unlawful reductions.

Overcoming Fear of Litigation

  • Common Misconceptions:
    • Some providers avoid legal action fearing retaliation or increased scrutiny.
  • Reality:
    • Insurers are legally prohibited from penalizing providers for asserting their rights.
  • Benefits of Legal Action:
    • Often leads to correct payments in future claims.
    • Can result in reimbursement of legal fees and additional damages.

Steps to Strengthen Your Position

  1. Stay Informed:
    • Keep up-to-date with changes in PIP laws and regulations.
    • Attend seminars or workshops on medical billing and insurance practices.
  2. Educate Your Staff:
    • Train billing and administrative staff to recognize improper reductions.
    • Implement protocols for handling disputes with insurers.
  3. Consult Legal Professionals:
    • Establish a relationship with a Florida PIP attorney.
    • Seek advice before issues escalate to ensure timely and effective responses.

Why Consult a Florida PIP Attorney

Expertise in PIP Law

  • Specialized Knowledge:
    • PIP attorneys understand the nuances of Florida insurance statutes and case law.
  • Effective Strategies:
    • They can develop tailored approaches to recover underpaid amounts.

Maximizing Recovery

  • Comprehensive Review:
    • Attorneys can audit past claims to identify patterns of underpayment.
  • Negotiation Skills:
    • Experienced in negotiating with insurers to reach favorable settlements.

Peace of Mind

  • Focus on Patient Care:
    • Allow you to concentrate on providing medical services without the stress of financial disputes.
  • Legal Protection:
    • Ensure your rights are protected throughout the dispute process.

How to Choose the Right Attorney

  • Experience:
    • Look for attorneys with a proven track record in PIP litigation.
  • Reputation:
    • Seek recommendations from colleagues or professional associations.
  • Communication:
    • Choose someone who communicates clearly and keeps you informed.

Conclusion

Accepting less than what you are owed for your medical services not only affects your practice but also undermines the integrity of the healthcare system in Florida. Insurance companies have obligations under the law to be transparent and fair in their reimbursement practices. By standing up against improper reductions, you protect your financial interests and contribute to a more equitable environment for all medical providers.

Take Action Today:

  • Review Your Policies and EOBs:
    • Ensure you understand how insurers are reimbursing your services.
  • Consult a Florida PIP Attorney:
    • Get professional advice to recover any underpaid amounts.
  • Empower Your Practice:
    • Implement strategies to prevent future underpayments.

FAQs about Florida PIP Insurance Underpayments for Medical Providers

What should I do if a PIP insurance carrier is underpaying my medical practice in Florida?

If you suspect underpayment, review your Explanation of Benefits (EOBs) for unexplained reductions or unfamiliar codes. Consult a Florida PIP attorney who can assess your case and help you recover any owed payments through legal action if necessary.

Can insurance companies reduce reimbursements using Medicare coding methodologies without informing providers?

No, Florida law requires insurers to clearly and unambiguously state any payment methodologies, including Medicare coding reductions, in their policies. Without proper disclosure, such reductions are impermissible, and providers may challenge them legally.

Are reductions for services provided by Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners allowed under PIP insurance?

Reductions to 85% of the fee schedule for services by PAs and nurse practitioners are only permissible if explicitly stated in the insurer’s policy. Without clear policy language, applying these reductions is improper under Florida law.

How does the Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction (MPPR) affect my reimbursements, and is it lawful for insurers to apply it?

MPPR reduces payments for multiple procedures performed on the same patient on the same day. Insurers can only apply MPPR if their policy explicitly elects this methodology. If not clearly stated, its application is unlawful, and you may be entitled to full reimbursement.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

no fee guarantee
Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.